Prior to launch 3rd December 1993
Jenter

The Ship - Details and History

The 'site for, and about, Jenter, Crew and Friends

last updated on 18/04/2003 


 
The website has five pages.  You can go from this page to any other.  Just click on the links, at the side.

The home page has the latest news, the ship gives some insight into the history and detail of the ship, ship's log is self explanatory, planning can be a little vague and maintenance is necessary from time to time.

home
the ship
ship's log
planning
maintenance

 
History of Jenter

The contract for the construction of our new yacht was placed on the 6th September 1993 and was signed by both Peter and Jennifer Cosker, as joint owners, and by James Boulton for Victoria Marine Limited.  I note that a cheque for £11,972.66 changed hands, being the first of three equal stage payments with a fourth payment, of the balance, to be paid after acceptance trials were completed.  The contract number was F26 9445 and delivery was planned for January 1994 at Warsash, Southampton.

Our new boat was to be a Frances 26.  I see that the first letter from James Boulton was dated 5th September 1991, so we had been talking to Victoria Marine for over two years before placing the order.  We wanted a new boat, to be used for extended cruising, that had to be strong and capable of sailing in heavy weather, and it had to be a boat we could afford.

Changes were already afoot at Victoria Marine, for they had merged with Westerly Yachts to become Westerly-Victoria.  Hull number 9445 became the first Frances to be built at Waterlooville.  During the autumn of 1993 we paid many visits to the old Westerly factory to check on the progress being made.

This is one of the earlier pictures of our new yacht.  We are looking over the starboard bow towards the area of the chart table and galley.  The engine bed is just visible, but the engine and gearbox are just hanging about, waiting to be fitted.

As the construction progressed, we came under increasing pressure to think of a name for the new ship.  James, despairing of us ever making a decision, came up with the idea of "Jenter".  It is, of course, Jennifer and Peter but with bits left out.

When as much of the interior as possible had been completed, the deck moulding was added and the boat was transported by road to Warsash on the River Hamble for final fitting-out.

Joanne, of Stone Pier Yard, breaks a bottle of champagne over the bow roller on the 3rd December prior to lowering Jenter into the water for the first time.  The launch had to be when a high spring tide gave a sufficient depth of water during a normal working day.

At this stage Jenter was far from finished.  The rapid progress made since September slowed to a crawl and stopped altogether over first Christmas and then the New Year and the London Boat Show period.  The fact that we had now been parted from most of our money may also have had something to do with it.

The acceptance sail took place on the 22nd January 1994 and that showed-up some items requiring rectification (in fact, a very long list)!  We eventually sailed Jenter away on the 19th February but without the staysail and with some work still unfinished.

On the sail to Brighton, the large nut on the stern greaser came loose, filling the bilge with water.  Safely in harbour, we discovered that the locking nut was at the far end of the thread and had never been tightened.

We also discovered that the engine cooling water inlet cock was seized and could not be closed.  When the boat was lifted at Eastbourne to remedy this, at Westerly-Victoria's expense, the anti-foul paint washed-off because the hull had not been properly prepared.  When the autohelm failed, we discovered that it had been fitted incorrectly and so it went on with one thing after another causing problems.

To end this section on a happier note, here is a picture of Peter sailing Jenter off Eastbourne (photograph by Stanley Cosker taken from "Knight of Stromness").  The log shows that this picture was taken on the 11th March 1994 when the log had only 127nm from new!


What Type of Craft is She?

The Frances 26 was designed by Chuck Paine. 

She is a double-ender, pointed at the bows and at the stern as well.  The truth is that many boats are, at least below the waterline, even if they sport flat transoms above!  But, Jenter is a true double-ender and also sports a long keel, which is supposed to be really good at sea.  It does, of course, make her almost unmanageable around marinas but that fact is rarely mentioned.  The photograph is of Jenter under main and staysail only in the Western Solent (courtesy of John Tyer on "Annjohlyn").

Jenter is built of GRP (glass reinforced plastic), as most boats are these days.  It is supposed to be the easy option.  Easier to maintain than wood, or steel, or ferro-concrete.  Some of the other options.  Instead of brilliant white, we opted for a cream-coloured gelcoat as our boat is of a more traditional styling.  The mast is keel-stepped.  This just means that it goes straight through the deck and down to the keel.  Other masts are deck-stepped and have a supporting pillar below.  I doubt there is any difference but keel-stepped is supposed to be stronger.

The rig is a bermudan cutter.  We have two fore sails and a main.  They are all tan-coloured sails to go with the cream hull.  With this traditional design, the sails go to the mast-head, no fractional rigs here!  The forward sail is a yankee with a high cut foot, which is on furling gear for ease of operation.  This is followed by the staysail on a self-tacking boom, but still loose-footed.  The slot between the yankee and staysail, when properly set, is supposed to produce more power than the sum of the parts, so as to speak.  The main has a long foot, giving a large area, although the mast is not particularly high.

To accommodate the rig, Jenter has a short bowsprit and her rudder is hung externally on pintels.  The auxiliary, single-cylinder, diesel engine drives a two-bladed propeller in an aperture between keel and rudder.  This is a most inefficient arrangement.


Below Decks

The double-ender design seriously limits the space below decks compared with more modern designs that have transoms and such luxuries as a master cabins aft.  We are told that our craft should be able to sleep four but we find it a little cramped with just the two of us.  Probably, the best berth is the port side, aft, quarter berth.  It is both roomy and would keep one secure even when the boat was well heeled.  The starboard settee berth has a lee cloth for security and whilst quite long is rather too narrow for comfort.  In harbour, or at anchor, we normally use the forward double berth although this has limited, I should say very limited, headroom!

The design is open plan and that helps give an impression of space.  White 'formica' type surfaces and light coloured wood are contrasted by dark red upholstery and dark blue curtains.

The picture shows Jenny working at the chart table, which is well constructed, holds a good number of charts, and folds away neatly when not in use.

The galley sink and the oven are nicely mounted in a galley unit.  Only cold water is available from a foot-operated pump.  The oven has a two burner hob and a grill as well as the oven itself and it is, of course, gimballed.

Steps lead up, over the engine compartment, to the deck.

On the starboard side, the heads compartment is really too small for comfortable use.  Forward of that, the wet locker is well-constructed and quite adequate.  The cupboards have shelves and are nicely finished with the forward one doubling as a library and drinks' cupboard!  Most important.  There is no dining table.  With just two crew, the chart table serves that purpose well enough.


Return to the top of this page.